‡ NøRMÅNDÝ887 ‡
Senior Member
Abraham Lincoln is pretty cool, huh?
Posts: 276
|
Post by ‡ NøRMÅNDÝ887 ‡ on Aug 18, 2006 0:50:29 GMT
44 = 42+3-1 Hehe easy one
|
|
|
Post by Freedom-Fighter on Aug 18, 2006 9:19:21 GMT
45 = (43+2)x1
Another easy one!
|
|
|
Post by sPiRiTnInJa on Aug 18, 2006 10:45:59 GMT
46 = 43 + 2 + 1
roflmao
|
|
|
Post by Mauritania on Aug 18, 2006 11:19:04 GMT
47 = 2 X 3 + 41
By the way, can use the mathematical symbol '!'
|
|
|
Post by sPiRiTnInJa on Aug 18, 2006 11:25:54 GMT
48 = 24 x (3 - 1)
|
|
|
Post by Freedom-Fighter on Aug 18, 2006 12:32:40 GMT
49 = 24x3+1
By the way, can you use decimal, percent and fractions?
|
|
Bruno
Junior Member
Posts: 117
|
Post by Bruno on Aug 18, 2006 14:35:43 GMT
50: (-13)(-4)+(-2)
|
|
Levi
Junior Member
Posts: 174
|
Post by Levi on Aug 18, 2006 17:17:10 GMT
51 = 12x4+3 --- By the way, can use the mathematical symbol '!' It's called factorial if i'm not mistaken. Sorry, you can only use the (+), (-), (x), ( and (^).
|
|
Bruno
Junior Member
Posts: 117
|
Post by Bruno on Aug 19, 2006 16:48:48 GMT
Number 52 is a very hard number...I can't think of anything...
|
|
Levi
Junior Member
Posts: 174
|
Post by Levi on Aug 19, 2006 19:54:01 GMT
Hehe, It was a rather hard one.
52 = 4^3-12
|
|
Levi
Junior Member
Posts: 174
|
Post by Levi on Aug 20, 2006 7:50:37 GMT
I think we need to use the 'root' action too... Otherwise it'll get too hard if not impossible all together.
Let's make the root look like this -> [x]
Examples: [9] = 3 [16] = 4 [64] = 8
|
|
Levi
Junior Member
Posts: 174
|
Post by Levi on Aug 20, 2006 21:06:16 GMT
Ok, 53 is kinda immposible isn't it...
|
|
|
Post by sPiRiTnInJa on Aug 20, 2006 23:28:27 GMT
I think so.
|
|
|
Post by Freedom-Fighter on Aug 20, 2006 23:55:09 GMT
I can't think of a way either, it took me 15 minutes and I still can't think of anything! Perhaps we should include fraction, percent and decimals and see if they work. Though I don't think they can be very useful.
|
|
‡ NøRMÅNDÝ887 ‡
Senior Member
Abraham Lincoln is pretty cool, huh?
Posts: 276
|
Post by ‡ NøRMÅNDÝ887 ‡ on Aug 21, 2006 15:36:55 GMT
We can probably solve the problem if we add more numbers (5, 6, 7, 8...)
|
|